↓ Skip to main content

Perinatal characteristics among early (10–14 years old) and late (15–19 years old) pregnant adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perinatal characteristics among early (10–14 years old) and late (15–19 years old) pregnant adolescents
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-531
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Guilherme Bezerra Alves, Rosangela Meira Rodrigues Cisneiros, Luciana Paula Fernandes Dutra, Renato Américo Pinto

Abstract

Pregnancy in adolescents is a worldwide health problem and has been mostly common in poor populations. It is not clear if socioeconomic or biological factors are the main determinants of perinatal adverse outcomes in pregnant adolescents. Adolescents under 15 years old may present a high growth rate which may contribute to impair fetal growth. Our aim is to compare perinatal characteristics among early (aged 10 to 14 years) and late (aged 15 to 19 years) pregnant adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 26%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,830,338
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,007
of 4,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,161
of 178,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#23
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.