↓ Skip to main content

Muted responses to chronic experimental nitrogen deposition on the Colorado Plateau

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Muted responses to chronic experimental nitrogen deposition on the Colorado Plateau
Published in
Oecologia, January 2021
DOI 10.1007/s00442-020-04841-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michala L. Phillips, Daniel E. Winkler, Robin H. Reibold, Brooke B. Osborne, Sasha C. Reed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Unspecified 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Environmental Science 4 20%
Unspecified 2 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,351,522
of 21,873,319 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#631
of 4,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,588
of 488,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#19
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,873,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.