You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
書評「このあななんじゃ ひがたのいきもの へん」
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Benthology, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.5179/benthos.75.74_1 |
Authors |
清家 弘治 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 8 | 32% |
Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,101,720
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Benthology
#4
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,789
of 530,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Benthology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one scored the same or higher as 42 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them