↓ Skip to main content

Upland burning and grazing as strategies to offset climate-change effects on wetlands

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands Ecology & Management, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Upland burning and grazing as strategies to offset climate-change effects on wetlands
Published in
Wetlands Ecology & Management, January 2021
DOI 10.1007/s11273-020-09778-1
Authors

Owen P. McKenna, David A. Renton, David M. Mushet, Edward S. DeKeyser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#9,813,130
of 16,636,435 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands Ecology & Management
#204
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,494
of 257,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands Ecology & Management
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,636,435 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.