↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007820.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

de Souza RF, Travess H, Newton T, Marchesan MA, de Souza, Raphael Freitas, Travess, Helen, Newton, Tim, Marchesan, Melissa A

Abstract

Teeth that have suffered trauma can fuse to the surrounding bone - the process referred to as dental ankylosis. Ankylosed permanent front teeth fail to erupt during facial growth and can become displaced, thus resulting in functional and aesthetic problems. Dental ankylosis is also associated with root resorption, which eventually leads to the loss of affected teeth. Different interventions for the management of ankylosed permanent front teeth have been described but it is unclear which are the most effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 66%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 21%
Other 5 17%
Other 18 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 162%
Unspecified 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Materials Science 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,369,161
of 12,651,470 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,389
of 10,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,088
of 129,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,651,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.