You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1084/jem.20202135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Song, Ce Zhang, Benjamin Israelow, Alice Lu-Culligan, Alba Vieites Prado, Sophie Skriabine, Peiwen Lu, Orr-El Weizman, Feimei Liu, Yile Dai, Klara Szigeti-Buck, Yuki Yasumoto, Guilin Wang, Christopher Castaldi, Jaime Heltke, Evelyn Ng, John Wheeler, Mia Madel Alfajaro, Etienne Levavasseur, Benjamin Fontes, Neal G. Ravindra, David Van Dijk, Shrikant Mane, Murat Gunel, Aaron Ring, Syed A. Jaffar Kazmi, Kai Zhang, Craig B. Wilen, Tamas L. Horvath, Isabelle Plu, Stephane Haik, Jean-Leon Thomas, Angeliki Louvi, Shelli F. Farhadian, Anita Huttner, Danielle Seilhean, Nicolas Renier, Kaya Bilguvar, Akiko Iwasaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,353 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 553 | 13% |
| Germany | 267 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 173 | 4% |
| Japan | 160 | 4% |
| Spain | 114 | 3% |
| France | 73 | 2% |
| Canada | 64 | 1% |
| Mexico | 64 | 1% |
| Austria | 39 | <1% |
| Other | 416 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2430 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3849 | 88% |
| Scientists | 310 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 128 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 63 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 734 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 734 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 105 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 9% |
| Other | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 116 | 16% |
| Unknown | 250 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 91 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 76 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 47 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 12% |
| Unknown | 290 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2623. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,874
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#1
of 11,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167
of 533,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.