↓ Skip to main content

Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 435)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
755 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419
Authors

Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Paul R. Ehrlich, Andrew Beattie, Gerardo Ceballos, Eileen Crist, Joan Diamond, Rodolfo Dirzo, Anne H. Ehrlich, John Harte, Mary Ellen Harte, Graham Pyke, Peter H. Raven, William J. Ripple, Frédérik Saltré, Christine Turnbull, Mathis Wackernagel, Daniel T. Blumstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,343 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 755 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 755 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 13%
Student > Master 85 11%
Other 50 7%
Student > Bachelor 44 6%
Other 132 17%
Unknown 222 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 138 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 135 18%
Social Sciences 49 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 3%
Other 139 18%
Unknown 251 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3440. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,762
of 26,367,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106
of 538,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them