↓ Skip to main content

Effect of prosocial public health messages for population behaviour change in relation to respiratory infections: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of prosocial public health messages for population behaviour change in relation to respiratory infections: a systematic review protocol
Published in
BMJ Open, January 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044763
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aikaterini Grimani, Chris Bonell, Susan Michie, Vivi Antonopoulou, Michael P Kelly, Ivo Vlaev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 26 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 26 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,618,949
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#6,965
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,104
of 523,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#202
of 747 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 747 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.