↓ Skip to main content

Effect of prosocial public health messages for population behaviour change in relation to respiratory infections: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of prosocial public health messages for population behaviour change in relation to respiratory infections: a systematic review protocol
Published in
BMJ Open, January 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044763
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aikaterini Grimani, Chris Bonell, Susan Michie, Vivi Antonopoulou, Michael P Kelly, Ivo Vlaev

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Social Sciences 4 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 8 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,358,095
of 17,704,521 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,735
of 16,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,009
of 401,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#158
of 680 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,704,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 680 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.