↓ Skip to main content

Dissociating object familiarity from linguistic properties in mirror word reading

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissociating object familiarity from linguistic properties in mirror word reading
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-3-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice M Proverbio, Friederike Wiedemann, Roberta Adorni, Valentina Rossi, Marzia Del Zotto, Alberto Zani, Proverbio AM, Wiedemann F, Adorni R, Rossi V, Del Zotto M, Zani A

Abstract

It is known that the orthographic properties of linguistic stimuli are processed within the left occipitotemporal cortex at about 150-200 ms. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to words in standard or mirror orientation to investigate the role of visual word form in reading. Word inversion was performed to determine whether rotated words lose their linguistic properties.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 39 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 38%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,267,507
of 4,720,335 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#132
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,598
of 80,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,720,335 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.