You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissociating object familiarity from linguistic properties in mirror word reading
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-3-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice M Proverbio, Friederike Wiedemann, Roberta Adorni, Valentina Rossi, Marzia Del Zotto, Alberto Zani |
| Abstract |
It is known that the orthographic properties of linguistic stimuli are processed within the left occipitotemporal cortex at about 150-200 ms. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to words in standard or mirror orientation to investigate the role of visual word form in reading. Word inversion was performed to determine whether rotated words lose their linguistic properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#256
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,773
of 79,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.