↓ Skip to main content

Mononuclear phagocyte depletion strategies in models of acute kidney disease: what are they trying to tell us?

Overview of attention for article published in Kidney International, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mononuclear phagocyte depletion strategies in models of acute kidney disease: what are they trying to tell us?
Published in
Kidney International, October 2012
DOI 10.1038/ki.2012.164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew D. Griffin

Abstract

Mononuclear phagocytes (macrophages, dendritic cells, and monocytes) play a complex role in kidney disease. Techniques for selectively depleting them in rodents have made important contributions but have also generated some contradictory results. Ferenbach et al. report that two widely used mononuclear phagocyte depletion techniques differentially affect early severity of renal ischemia/reperfusion injury and provide evidence that this may be due to a residual, protective subset that persists in the kidney after one of the two techniques.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Chemistry 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,647,603
of 12,236,571 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#3,607
of 4,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,589
of 124,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,236,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.