↓ Skip to main content

qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 5,108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
341 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Greg S. Martin, Mitchell M. Levy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 302 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 48 16%
Other 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Master 31 10%
Other 84 27%
Unknown 37 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 206 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 52 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 258. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#68,462
of 16,258,151 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#22
of 5,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,760
of 211,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,258,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.