↓ Skip to main content

qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
327 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Greg S. Martin, Mitchell M. Levy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 327 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 345 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 46 13%
Other 42 12%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Researcher 31 9%
Other 89 25%
Unknown 69 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 1%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 85 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#154,310
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#64
of 6,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,970
of 360,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.