You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Tragedy of Errors: Political Ideology, Perceived Journalistic Quality, and Media Trust
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journalism Practice, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2021.1873167 |
| Authors |
Tamar Wilner, Ryan Wallace, Ivan Lacasa-Mas, Emily Goldstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,902,058
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Practice
#610
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,247
of 534,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Practice
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.