You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Restoring metabolism of myeloid cells reverses cognitive decline in ageing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-03160-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paras S. Minhas, Amira Latif-Hernandez, Melanie R. McReynolds, Aarooran S. Durairaj, Qian Wang, Amanda Rubin, Amit U. Joshi, Joy Q. He, Esha Gauba, Ling Liu, Congcong Wang, Miles Linde, Yuki Sugiura, Peter K. Moon, Ravi Majeti, Makoto Suematsu, Daria Mochly-Rosen, Irving L. Weissman, Frank M. Longo, Joshua D. Rabinowitz, Katrin I. Andreasson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 669 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 176 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 6% |
| Germany | 29 | 4% |
| Japan | 21 | 3% |
| Spain | 20 | 3% |
| Canada | 14 | 2% |
| France | 12 | 2% |
| Australia | 11 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 78 | 12% |
| Unknown | 261 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 423 | 63% |
| Scientists | 208 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 696 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 696 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 127 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 103 | 15% |
| Unknown | 186 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 133 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 100 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 56 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 12% |
| Unknown | 211 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 876. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,809
of 25,934,224 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,038
of 99,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#830
of 536,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#54
of 845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 536,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.