You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening Mosquito House Entry Points as a Potential Method for Integrated Control of Endophagic Filariasis, Arbovirus and Malaria Vectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila B. Ogoma, Dickson W. Lweitoijera, Hassan Ngonyani, Benjamin Furer, Tanya L. Russell, Wolfgang R. Mukabana, Gerry F. Killeen, Sarah J. Moore |
| Abstract |
Partial mosquito-proofing of houses with screens and ceilings has the potential to reduce indoor densities of malaria mosquitoes. We wish to measure whether it will also reduce indoor densities of vectors of neglected tropical diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| French Polynesia | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 15% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#7,316
of 9,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,334
of 104,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#43
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.