You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
House modifications for preventing malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013398.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna Furnival-Adams, Evelyn A Olanga, Mark Napier, Paul Garner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| South Africa | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 79% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#912,232
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,687
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,029
of 535,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.