↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Acceleration Leads to Rapid Weakening in Earthquake-Like Laboratory Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Acceleration Leads to Rapid Weakening in Earthquake-Like Laboratory Experiments
Published in
Science, October 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1221195
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. C. Chang, D. A. Lockner, Z. Reches

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 57%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Energy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2012.
All research outputs
#1,213,095
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Science
#20,768
of 77,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,674
of 172,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#223
of 796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.