↓ Skip to main content

A chapter a day – Association of book reading with longevity

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 5,435)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
118 news outlets
book_reviews
2 book reviewers
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
1061 tweeters
facebook
62 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
14 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
A chapter a day – Association of book reading with longevity
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bavishi, Avni, Slade, Martin D, Levy, Becca R, Avni Bavishi, Martin D. Slade, Becca R. Levy

Abstract

Although books can expose people to new people and places, whether books also have health benefits beyond other types of reading materials is not known. This study examined whether those who read books have a survival advantage over those who do not read books and over those who read other types of materials, and if so, whether cognition mediates this book reading effect. The cohort consisted of 3635 participants in the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study who provided information about their reading patterns at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were based on survival information up to 12 years after baseline. A dose-response survival advantage was found for book reading by tertile (HRT2 = 0.83, p < 0.001, HRT3 = 0.77, p < 0.001), after adjusting for relevant covariates including age, sex, race, education, comorbidities, self-rated health, wealth, marital status, and depression. Book reading contributed to a survival advantage that was significantly greater than that observed for reading newspapers or magazines (tT2 = 90.6, p < 0.001; tT3 = 67.9, p < 0.001). Compared to non-book readers, book readers had a 23-month survival advantage at the point of 80% survival in the unadjusted model. A survival advantage persisted after adjustment for all covariates (HR = .80, p < .01), indicating book readers experienced a 20% reduction in risk of mortality over the 12 years of follow up compared to non-book readers. Cognition mediated the book reading-survival advantage (p = 0.04). These findings suggest that the benefits of reading books include a longer life in which to read them.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,061 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Switzerland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 37 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Librarian 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 21%
Psychology 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Computer Science 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 12 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1970. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#267
of 7,749,980 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#1
of 5,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18
of 255,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#1
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,749,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.