↓ Skip to main content

A validation of ground ambulance pre-hospital times modeled using geographic information systems

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A validation of ground ambulance pre-hospital times modeled using geographic information systems
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alka B Patel, Nigel M Waters, Ian E Blanchard, Christopher J Doig, William A Ghali

Abstract

Evaluating geographic access to health services often requires determining the patient travel time to a specified service. For urgent care, many research studies have modeled patient pre-hospital time by ground emergency medical services (EMS) using geographic information systems (GIS). The purpose of this study was to determine if the modeling assumptions proposed through prior United States (US) studies are valid in a non-US context, and to use the resulting information to provide revised recommendations for modeling travel time using GIS in the absence of actual EMS trip data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Computer Science 12 10%
Engineering 12 10%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,066,678
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#201
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,117
of 172,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.