↓ Skip to main content

Calcium intake: good for the bones but bad for the heart? An analysis of clinical studies

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 800)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcium intake: good for the bones but bad for the heart? An analysis of clinical studies
Published in
Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, February 2016
DOI 10.1590/2359-3997000000173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Alcantara Cunha Lima, Priscilla Damião Araújo Lima, Maria da Glória Costa Reis Monteiro de Barros, Lívia Paiva Vardiero, Elisa Fernandes de Melo, Francisco de Paula Paranhos-Neto, Miguel Madeira, Maria Lucia Fleiuss de Farias

Abstract

The proper dietary calcium intake and calcium supplementation, when indicated, are important factors in the acquisition of peak bone mass during youth and in the prevention of fractures in old age. In addition to its deposition in bone, calcium confers an increase in its resistance and exhibits important activities in different enzymatic pathways in the body (e.g., neural, hormonal, muscle-related and blood clotting pathways). Thus, calcium supplementation can directly or indirectly affect important functions in the body, such as the control of blood pressure, plasma glucose, body weight, lipid profile and endothelial function. Since one publication reported increased cardiovascular risk due to calcium supplementation, many researchers have studied whether this risk actually exists; the results are conflicting, and the involved mechanisms are uncertain. However, studies that have evaluated the influence of the consumption of foods rich in calcium have reported no increase in the cardiovascular risk, which suggests that nutritional intake should be prioritized as a method for supplementation and that the use of calcium supplements should be reserved for patients who truly need supplementation and are unable to achieve the recommended daily nutritional intake of calcium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 28%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,147,137
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#8
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,956
of 409,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.