↓ Skip to main content

Publication proportions for registered breast cancer trials: before and following the introduction of the ClinicalTrials.gov results database

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Publication proportions for registered breast cancer trials: before and following the introduction of the ClinicalTrials.gov results database
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41073-016-0017-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Innocent Gerald Asiimwe, Dickson Rumona

Abstract

To limit selective and incomplete publication of the results of clinical trials, registries including ClinicalTrials.gov were introduced. The ClinicalTrials.gov registry added a results database in 2008 to enable researchers to post the results of their trials as stipulated by the Food and Drug Administration Amendment Act of 2007. This study aimed to determine the direction and magnitude of any change in publication proportions of registered breast cancer trials that occurred since the inception of the ClinicalTrials.gov results database. A cross-sectional study design was employed using ClinicalTrials.gov, a publicly available registry/results database as the primary data source. Registry contents under the subcategories 'Breast Neoplasms' and 'Breast Neoplasms, Male' were downloaded on 1 August 2015. A literature search for included trials was afterwards conducted using MEDLINE and DISCOVER databases to determine publication status of the registered breast cancer trials. Nearly half (168/340) of the listed trials had been published, with a median time to publication of 24 months (Q1 = 14 months, Q3 = 42 months). Only 86 trials were published within 24 months of completion. There was no significant increase in publication proportions of trials that were completed before the introduction of the results database compared to those completed after (OR = 1.00, 95 % CI = .61 to 1.63; adjusted OR = 0.84, 95 % CI = .51 to 1.39). Characteristics associated with publication included trial type (observational versus interventional adjusted OR = .28, 95 % CI = .10 to .74) and completion/termination status (terminated versus completed adjusted OR = .22, 95 % CI = .09 to .51). Less than a half of breast cancer trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov are published in peer-reviewed journals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Philosophy 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,979,459
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#110
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,312
of 363,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.