↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012863.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Apiwat Aue-aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Siwanon Rattanakanokchai, Khadra Galaal, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Librarian 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,653,658
of 17,397,008 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,093
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,308
of 323,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,397,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.