↓ Skip to main content

Tariffs As Electoral Weapons: The Political Geography of the US–China Trade War

Overview of attention for article published in International Organization, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 870)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
175 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
4 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tariffs As Electoral Weapons: The Political Geography of the US–China Trade War
Published in
International Organization, January 2021
DOI 10.1017/s0020818320000612
Authors

Sung Eun Kim, Yotam Margalit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 55%
Unspecified 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#247,589
of 21,799,263 outputs
Outputs from International Organization
#20
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,725
of 421,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Organization
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,799,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.