You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Longitudinal touchscreen use across early development is associated with faster exogenous and reduced endogenous attention control
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-81775-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana Maria Portugal, Rachael Bedford, Celeste H. M. Cheung, Luke Mason, Tim J. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 35% |
United States | 7 | 18% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 78% |
Scientists | 7 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 24 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 9 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#115,063
of 24,797,973 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,426
of 135,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,396
of 518,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#58
of 4,508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,797,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.