↓ Skip to main content

Bat activity affected by sewage effluent in Irish rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bat activity affected by sewage effluent in Irish rivers
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.012
Authors

I.M. Abbott, D.P. Sleeman, S. Harrison

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Other 18 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 62%
Environmental Science 31 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,662,486
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,699
of 5,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,360
of 143,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.