↓ Skip to main content

Recovery of degraded areas revegeted with Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus with special reference to organic matter humification

Overview of attention for article published in Scientia Agricola, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recovery of degraded areas revegeted with Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus with special reference to organic matter humification
Published in
Scientia Agricola, January 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0103-90162009000300010
Authors

Canellas, Luciano Pasqualoto

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 29%
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Engineering 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,894,568
of 4,654,880 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,631
of 80,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,654,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them