The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reptiles of the Serra das Torres Natural Monument: using the Rapid Assessment method to fill a knowledge gap in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0726 |
Authors |
Jane C. F. Oliveira, Rafael dos Santos, Mateus Leite Lopes-Silva, Lorena da Penha Vasconcelos Barros, Bárbara Risse-Quaioto, Cátia Moura Militão, Pedro Fatorelli, Flávia A. L. Belmoch, Thiago Marcial de Castro, Carlos Frederico Duarte Rocha |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#33
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,533
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.