↓ Skip to main content

Guía de profilaxia y tratamiento antitrombótico para pacientes con COVID-19. Consenso del Grupo Cooperativo Latinoamericano en Hemostasia y Trombosis (CLAHT)

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 237)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guía de profilaxia y tratamiento antitrombótico para pacientes con COVID-19. Consenso del Grupo Cooperativo Latinoamericano en Hemostasia y Trombosis (CLAHT)
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, December 2021
DOI 10.24875/acm.20000291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia Guillermo-Esposito, Patricia Casais, Gabriela Cesarman-Maus, Fernanda Andrade-Orsi, Rosario Martínez-Rovira, Joao C de-Campos-Guerra, Suely M Rezende, Raúl Izaguirre-Ávila, Raúl Altman, José Ceresetto, Cecilia Colorio, Cristina Duboscq, Claudio Martín Rosa, Soledad Molnar, Diana García, Mario Luis Tejarina, Nelson Nina García, Juan Choque Pacheco, Chiara Chindamo J. María, Gloria Ramos Ramos, Guillermo León Basantes, Aura Milena Reyna, Miriam Cantero Guevara, Mateo Porres Aguilar, Luis Meillón, Flavio Adrián Grimaldo, Ludwing Alexander Bacon Fonseca, Al Ávila Milord, Ricardo Aguilar, Rafael Aparicio, Paula de Guggiari, Gloria Chumpitaz, Pedro Pablo García, Blanca Steffano, Sandra Damiano, Juan Serrano, Marisol Zavahra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,348,718
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#33
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,354
of 514,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.