You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite high seroprevalence
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00183-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ester C Sabino, Lewis F Buss, Maria P S Carvalho, Carlos A Prete, Myuki A E Crispim, Nelson A Fraiji, Rafael H M Pereira, Kris V Parag, Pedro da Silva Peixoto, Moritz U G Kraemer, Marcio K Oikawa, Tassila Salomon, Zulma M Cucunuba, Márcia C Castro, Andreza Aruska de Souza Santos, Vítor H Nascimento, Henrique S Pereira, Neil M Ferguson, Oliver G Pybus, Adam Kucharski, Michael P Busch, Christopher Dye, Nuno R Faria |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,680 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 486 | 9% |
Spain | 266 | 5% |
Brazil | 260 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 234 | 4% |
Japan | 201 | 4% |
Peru | 161 | 3% |
Germany | 113 | 2% |
Canada | 88 | 2% |
Mexico | 80 | 1% |
Other | 914 | 16% |
Unknown | 2877 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4825 | 85% |
Scientists | 472 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 279 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 96 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 647 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 647 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 87 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 72 | 11% |
Student > Master | 58 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 9% |
Professor | 44 | 7% |
Other | 127 | 20% |
Unknown | 204 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 36 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 3% |
Other | 124 | 19% |
Unknown | 226 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8007. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#311
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#34
of 41,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 515,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#6
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.