You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce household air pollution from solid biomass fuels and improve maternal and child health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01590-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine E. Woolley, Emma Dickinson-Craig, Suzanne E. Bartington, Tosin Oludotun, Bruce Kirenga, Shelton T. Mariga, Telesphore Kabera, April Coombe, Francis D. Pope, Ajit Singh, William R. Avis, Rosie Day, David Warburton, Semira Manaseki-Holland, David J. Moore, G. Neil Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,536,385
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,519
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,682
of 503,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#47
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.