↓ Skip to main content

Velopharyngeal dysfunction: a systematic review of major instrumental and auditory-perceptual assessments

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Velopharyngeal dysfunction: a systematic review of major instrumental and auditory-perceptual assessments
Published in
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, January 2014
DOI 10.7162/s1809-97772013000300004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Medeiros Paniagua, Alana Verza Signorini, Sady Selaimen da Costa, Marcus Vinicius Martins Collares, Sílvia Dornelles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 24%
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,783,531
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#227
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,272
of 308,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#16
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.