↓ Skip to main content

More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3385 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.27.21250617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lopez-Leon, Sandra, Wegman-Ostrosky, Talia, Perelman, Carol, Sepulveda, Rosalinda, Rebolledo, Paulina A, Cuapio, Angelica, Villapol, Sonia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,385 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2590. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,250
of 17,138,809 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#64
of 17,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115
of 265,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#11
of 2,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,138,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.