You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
仙台城(青葉城)水源(地下水)の水理地質
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.5917/jagh1959.7.10 |
| Authors |
奥津 春生 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,779,477
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,725
of 288,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them