↓ Skip to main content

Prophage recombinases-mediated genome engineering in Lactobacillus plantarum

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prophage recombinases-mediated genome engineering in Lactobacillus plantarum
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12934-015-0344-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Yang, Jing Wang, Qingsheng Qi

Abstract

Lactobacillus plantarum is a food-grade microorganism with industrial and medical relevance belonging to the group of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Traditional strategies for obtaining gene deletion variants in this organism are mainly vector-based double-crossover methods, which are inefficient and laborious. A feasible possibility to solve this problem is the recombineering, which greatly expands the possibilities for engineering DNA molecules in vivo in various organisms. In this work, a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) recombineering system was established in L. plantarum. An exonuclease encoded by lp_0642 and a potential host-nuclease inhibitor encoded by lp_0640 involved in dsDNA recombination were identified from a prophage P1 locus in L. plantarum WCFS1. These two proteins, combined with the previously characterized single strand annealing protein encoded by lp_0641, can perform homologous recombination between a heterologous dsDNA substrate and host genomic DNA. Based on this, we developed a method for marker-free genetic manipulation of the chromosome in L. plantarum. This Lp_0640-41-42-mediated recombination allowed easy screening of mutants and could serve as an alternative to other genetic manipulation methods. We expect that this method can help for understanding the probiotic functionality and physiology of LAB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,202,382
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#494
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,298
of 277,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.