↓ Skip to main content

When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
382 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
Published in
British Medical Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i3507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Garner, Sally Hopewell, Jackie Chandler, Harriet MacLehose, Holger J Schünemann, Elie A Akl, Joseph Beyene, Stephanie Chang, Rachel Churchill, Karin Dearness, Gordon Guyatt, Carol Lefebvre, Beth Liles, Rachel Marshall, Laura Martínez García, Chris Mavergames, Mona Nasser, Amir Qaseem, Margaret Sampson, Karla Soares-Weiser, Yemisi Takwoingi, Lehana Thabane, Marialena Trivella, Peter Tugwell, Emma Welsh, Ed C Wilson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 382 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 150 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 25 16%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Other 12 8%
Other 55 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 50%
Unspecified 26 16%
Psychology 14 9%
Computer Science 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 23 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 247. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#52,342
of 13,755,459 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,012
of 44,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,159
of 263,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#24
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.