↓ Skip to main content

Joint species distribution models of Everglades wading birds to inform restoration planning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint species distribution models of Everglades wading birds to inform restoration planning
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0245973
Pubmed ID
Authors

D’Acunto, Laura E., Pearlstine, Leonard, Romañach, Stephanie S.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Mathematics 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,766,714
of 20,581,464 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,555
of 177,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,199
of 408,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#210
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,581,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.