You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Erosion of Civilian Control in Democracies: A Comprehensive Framework for Comparative Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Comparative Political Studies, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1177/0010414021989757 |
Authors |
Polina Beliakova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 28% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
Brazil | 3 | 5% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 29 | 48% |
Members of the public | 27 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 14 | 56% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#735,579
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Political Studies
#98
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,372
of 537,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Political Studies
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.