↓ Skip to main content

Management of Respiratory Failure Caused by COVID-19 after Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of Respiratory Failure Caused by COVID-19 after Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy
Published in
Clinics, February 2021
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavio Roberto Takeda, Carlos de Almeida Obregon, Yasmin Peres Navarro, Marco Aurélio Santo Filho, Ulysses Ribeiro, Rubens Antônio Aissar Sallum, Ivan Cecconello

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Unspecified 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#543
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,445
of 528,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.