↓ Skip to main content

Participation of HIV prevention programs among men who have sex with men in two cities of China—a mixed method study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participation of HIV prevention programs among men who have sex with men in two cities of China—a mixed method study
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Ma, H Fisher Raymond, Erin C Wilson, Willi McFarland, Hongyan Lu, Xianbin Ding, Rongrong Lu, Xiaoyan Ma, Dongyan Xia, Jing Xu, Xiong He, Liangui Feng, Song Fan, Xuefeng Li, Jiangping Sun, Yujiang Jia, Yiming Shao, Yuhua Ruan, Yan Xiao

Abstract

Although various HIV prevention programs targeting men who have sex with men (MSM) are operating in China, whether and how these programs are being utilized is unclear. This study explores participation of HIV prevention programs and influencing factors among MSM in two cities in China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 31%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,021,996
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,074
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,052
of 172,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.