You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Trap-Door Mechanism for Zinc Acquisition by Streptococcus pneumoniae AdcA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
mBio, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1128/mbio.01958-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhenyao Luo, Jacqueline R. Morey, Evelyne Deplazes, Alina Motygullina, Aimee Tan, Katherine Ganio, Stephanie L. Neville, Nikolaos Eleftheriadis, Michael Isselstein, Victoria G. Pederick, James C. Paton, Thorben Cordes, Jeffrey R. Harmer, Bostjan Kobe, Christopher A. McDevitt |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 43% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 65% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,027,121
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from mBio
#1,656
of 5,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,569
of 418,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from mBio
#40
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.