↓ Skip to main content

A New Metrics for Countries' Fitness and Products' Complexity

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
A New Metrics for Countries' Fitness and Products' Complexity
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Tacchella, Matthieu Cristelli, Guido Caldarelli, Andrea Gabrielli, Luciano Pietronero

Abstract

Classical economic theories prescribe specialization of countries industrial production. Inspection of the country databases of exported products shows that this is not the case: successful countries are extremely diversified, in analogy with biosystems evolving in a competitive dynamical environment. The challenge is assessing quantitatively the non-monetary competitive advantage of diversification which represents the hidden potential for development and growth. Here we develop a new statistical approach based on coupled non-linear maps, whose fixed point defines a new metrics for the country Fitness and product Complexity. We show that a non-linear iteration is necessary to bound the complexity of products by the fitness of the less competitive countries exporting them. We show that, given the paradigm of economic complexity, the correct and simplest approach to measure the competitiveness of countries is the one presented in this work. Furthermore our metrics appears to be economically well-grounded.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Italy 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 155 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 30%
Researcher 35 21%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 40 24%
Physics and Astronomy 30 18%
Unspecified 20 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 10%
Computer Science 14 8%
Other 48 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#289,583
of 13,699,002 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,502
of 67,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,136
of 131,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,699,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them