↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy T Wang, Rebecca J Mullan, Melanie A Lane, Ahmad Hazem, Chaithra Prasad, Nicola W Gathaiya, M Mercè Fernández-Balsells, Amy Bagatto, Fernando Coto-Yglesias, Jantey Carey, Tarig A Elraiyah, Patricia J Erwin, Gunjan Y Gandhi, Victor M Montori, Mohammad Hassan Murad

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 28 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,462,933
of 21,875,616 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#884
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,201
of 419,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,875,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them