↓ Skip to main content

Pedological Analysis of Geophagic Behaviour in Captive Borneo Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus)

Overview of attention for article published in Primate Research, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pedological Analysis of Geophagic Behaviour in Captive Borneo Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus)
Published in
Primate Research, January 2010
DOI 10.2354/psj.26.59
Authors

Saika YAMAZAKI, Shohei TAKEDA, Eita TORII, Souzou SUZUKI, Mika SHIMIZU, Hidetoshi KUROTORI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,806,155
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Primate Research
#5
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,907
of 173,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primate Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them