↓ Skip to main content

Environmental (e)RNA advances the reliability of eDNA by predicting its age

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Environmental (e)RNA advances the reliability of eDNA by predicting its age
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-82205-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathaniel T. Marshall, Henry A. Vanderploeg, Subba Rao Chaganti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 35%
Environmental Science 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Engineering 2 3%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,977,496
of 18,702,874 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#23,566
of 100,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,498
of 359,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,702,874 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.