↓ Skip to main content

Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00245.x
Authors

David C. Douglas, Rolf Weinzierl, Sarah C. Davidson, Roland Kays, Martin Wikelski, Gil Bohrer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 234 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 26%
Student > Master 51 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Other 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 21 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 63%
Environmental Science 44 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Computer Science 6 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 27 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,088,566
of 15,192,866 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#642
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,931
of 136,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,192,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.