↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive polynomial rendering

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive polynomial rendering
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925936
Authors

Bochang Moon, Steven McDonagh, Kenny Mitchell, Markus Gross

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 4%
Czechia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 38 78%
Engineering 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,406,596
of 17,033,237 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#408
of 2,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,634
of 212,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,033,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them