↓ Skip to main content

Dietary factors associated with lifetime asthma or hayfever diagnosis in Australian middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
33 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary factors associated with lifetime asthma or hayfever diagnosis in Australian middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-11-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard R Rosenkranz, Sara K Rosenkranz, Kelly JJ Neessen

Abstract

There is abundant research relevant to genetic and environmental influences on asthma and hayfever, but little is known about dietary risk factors in Australian adults. This study's purpose was to identify dietary factors associated with lifetime asthma (AS) and asthma or hayfever (AS/HF) diagnosis in Australian middle-aged and older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 35%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Professor 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#788,679
of 23,983,367 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#226
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,379
of 175,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.