You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HC-Pro silencing suppressor significantly alters the gene expression profile in tobacco leaves and flowers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-11-68 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arto J Soitamo, Balaji Jada, Kirsi Lehto |
| Abstract |
RNA silencing is used in plants as a major defence mechanism against invasive nucleic acids, such as viruses. Accordingly, plant viruses have evolved to produce counter defensive RNA-silencing suppressors (RSSs). These factors interfere in various ways with the RNA silencing machinery in cells, and thereby disturb the microRNA (miRNA) mediated endogene regulation and induce developmental and morphological changes in plants. In this study we have explored these effects using previously characterized transgenic tobacco plants which constitutively express (under CaMV 35S promoter) the helper component-proteinase (HC-Pro) derived from a potyviral genome. The transcript levels of leaves and flowers of these plants were analysed using microarray techniques (Tobacco 4 × 44 k, Agilent). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,816
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,628
of 120,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.