You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.n189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ali Albasri, Miriam Hattle, Constantinos Koshiaris, Anna Dunnigan, Ben Paxton, Sarah Emma Fox, Margaret Smith, Lucinda Archer, Brooke Levis, Rupert A Payne, Richard D Riley, Nia Roberts, Kym I E Snell, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Juliet Usher-Smith, Richard Stevens, F D Richard Hobbs, Richard J McManus, James P Sheppard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 28 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 11% |
| Japan | 12 | 7% |
| United States | 8 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 78 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 125 | 71% |
| Scientists | 28 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 58 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#304,265
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,786
of 65,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,510
of 549,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#170
of 788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 549,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.