You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In situ mapping identifies distinct vascular niches for myelopoiesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03201-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jizhou Zhang, Qingqing Wu, Courtney B. Johnson, Giang Pham, Jeremy M. Kinder, Andre Olsson, Anastasiya Slaughter, Margot May, Benjamin Weinhaus, Angelo D’Alessandro, James Douglas Engel, Jean X. Jiang, J. Matthew Kofron, L. Frank Huang, V. B. Surya Prasath, Sing Sing Way, Nathan Salomonis, H. Leighton Grimes, Daniel Lucas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 65 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 9% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Israel | 6 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 50% |
| Scientists | 101 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#63,230
of 25,967,142 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,924
of 99,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,167
of 550,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#130
of 839 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 550,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 839 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.