| Title |
How much leaf area do insects eat? A data set of insect herbivory sampled globally with a standardized protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.3301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gisele M. Mendes, Fernando A. O. Silveira, Carolina Oliveira, Wesley Dáttilo, Roger Guevara, Betsabé Ruiz‐Guerra, Maria Gabriela Boaventura, Sershen, Syd Ramdhani, Shyam S. Phartyal, Sérvio P. Ribeiro, Victor Diniz Pinto, Heraldo L. Vasconcelos, Richard Tito, Cássio Cardoso Pereira, Bárbara Carvalho, Gabriel M. Carvalho, Ek del‐Val, Elise Buisson, André J. Arruda, Jean‐Baptiste Toth, Fabio de O. Roque, Allan Henrique Souza, Fabio Bolzan, Frederico Neves, Juliana Kuchenbecker, Guilherme Ramos Demetrio, Luziene Seixas, Gustavo Q. Romero, Paula M. de Omena, Jhonathan O. Silva, Lucas Paolucci, Elenir Queiroz, Mark K. J. Ooi, Charlotte H. Mills, Pille Gerhold, Anne Merzin, Jhonny C. Massante, Ramiro Aguilar, Lucas M. Carbone, Ricardo Campos, Inácio Gomes, Gabriela Zorzal, Ricardo Solar, Letícia Ramos, Tathiana Sobrinho, Pedro Sanders, Tatiana Cornelissen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 15 | 23% |
| United States | 11 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 14% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 48% |
| Scientists | 28 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#906,936
of 24,719,968 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#383
of 6,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,279
of 429,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#15
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,719,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.